The rapid expansion of spy drone applications in recent years has transformed the paradigm of security threats and played a decisive role in facilitating and intensifying the unrest of 2024. The ease of access to small commercial drones has facilitated unauthorized surveillance, collection of sensitive information, violation of privacy, and disruption of public order, thereby highlighting the necessity of defining the jurisprudential and legal status of this technology. Primary objective of this research is to examine the legal and jurisprudential dimensions of drone espionage operations and to investigate how legal gaps, weaknesses in regulatory mechanisms, and jurisprudential ambiguities contribute to increased security vulnerabilities and accelerate the outbreak of unrests. The research methodology is descriptive-analytical, based on library and documentary studies of domestic laws, international documents, jurisprudential opinions, and security sources. The findings indicate that current regulations regarding drone management, particularly in combating espionage and privacy violations, are fragmented and insufficient, lacking the capacity to address the complexities of emerging threats. From a jurisprudential perspective, principles such as the “prohibition of spying,” “necessity of preserving public security,” “prohibition of assisting in sin,” and “removal of harm” can serve as legitimizing foundations for more precise regulation and preventive policies. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the necessity of drafting a comprehensive legal framework for monitoring drone ownership and utilization, strengthening legal capacities to combat cyber-space espionage, and integrating jurisprudential approaches with statutory law. These measures aim to provide a basis for effective threat management and reduce the risk of similar unrests in the future.